Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  


The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Cassiel

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.024 released
« on: 01 October 2015, 15:06 »
Hmmm, I'm using beta 2. Let be upgrade and test. Thanks for checking.

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.024 released
« on: 30 September 2015, 13:51 »
Hmmm... think I might have spotted an issue in the new version with "Rename" enabled for WinRAR.

CMP asks if I want rename, then it appears to attempt to, but the RAR is not actually changed. There's no warning message or anything, it simply does not rename.

I'm using: rn -y -r -rr1 -ma5 -m5 -t -htc -ibck -qo+ %1 %2 %3

Awesome... Danke

I blame Win10... I'm blaming it for all my woes at the moment. LOL

Bump... since you seem to be in a coding mood the last few days.   :D

Undumped Wiki / Re: Toylet (2011, SEGA)
« on: 31 July 2015, 08:51 »
So many jokes about "dumping" this "toilet" game.... but I am an adult.

Saying that though, would love to play on Sega's latest 'hardware'. LOL

Quick suggestion, when adding DATs from a folder (in this case MAME hash files) where they already exist, add a 'Yes to All' option.

At the moment it asks if you want to replace existing, yes or no. And you have to click yes 300 odd times.

clrmame Discussion / Re: dat with language information
« on: 10 July 2015, 09:55 »
Ah, OK I see.

No, we have not broken out the flags into separate XML elements YET.   ;)

clrmame Discussion / Re: dat with language information
« on: 10 July 2015, 08:53 »
Sample from N64 Games DAT:

Air Boarder 64 (1998)(Human)(JP)(en-ja)

JP = released in Japan
en-ja = game includes English and Japanese languages

The TOSEC naming convention can be found here: http://www.tosecdev.org/tosec-naming-convention

clrmame Discussion / Re: dat with language information
« on: 09 July 2015, 10:53 »
TOSEC DATs contain both region and language flags:

clrmame Discussion / Re: DAT (depreciated) -> XML
« on: 19 January 2015, 17:13 »
Sorry to be a pain... how would I include MD5 too? It is already included in source DAT(s).

clrmame Discussion / Re: DAT (depreciated) -> XML
« on: 16 January 2015, 15:40 »
You are beautiful guys... thank you.   ;D

clrmame Discussion / DAT (depreciated) -> XML
« on: 16 January 2015, 11:58 »
Hey guys... this isn't necessarily a specific CMP question, but does anyone know a way that I can (bulk) convert a bunch of DATs in legacy format to the new n' shiny XML format?

I don't see anything under Dat2Dir, and I had it in my head that Logiqx's DatUtil could do this but I think I am mistaken.

Any pointers much appreciated...

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 4.016 released
« on: 24 December 2014, 10:57 »
misc:    some intern changes so that you got theoretically 32k path length support (Hello Tosec..)
         If you need such long paths, you need to add "\\?\" in front of your rom/sample/add/rebuilder
         source/destination/etc paths..
         So for example:
         \\?\E:\temp\this is a long folder name right or wrong blabalbalblablablablabalabl\

Hello Roman...   ;)

Thanks again for this, most appreciated.

clrmame Discussion / Re: (Another) new feature suggestion
« on: 16 December 2014, 11:36 »
Oops, sorry forgot to respond...

No problem, I understand. Realise I am very much in the minority (using RAR) too.

clrmame Discussion / Re: Excluding files
« on: 16 December 2014, 11:34 »
Meh... save the docs for when you write your new and shiny set-based CMP.   ;)

clrmame Discussion / Re: Batchrun Rebuilder question
« on: 16 December 2014, 10:37 »
Reminder to myself: Add a batcher option to force not compressed sets.

Seconded...  :D

clrmame Discussion / Re: Excluding files
« on: 16 December 2014, 10:19 »
See... this is why I read this forum. Always learning something new CMP can do!

clrmame Discussion / (Another) new feature suggestion
« on: 02 October 2014, 17:05 »
...to be filed under "yes please if easy to implement"   :P

Like chdman version check, can you implement the same for RAR version? Check for latest v5.0.


clrmame Discussion / Re: something to test
« on: 23 September 2014, 13:12 »
RE 2, I can have another play in >5 hours and see if anything similar happens?

(waiting on something to finish using these files)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6

Page created in 0.141 seconds with 19 queries.