EMULAB Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: may found bug  (Read 16071 times)

oddi

  • Member
  • *
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 65.0 Firefox 65.0
    • View Profile
Re: may found bug
« Reply #20 on: 31 December 2018, 18:05 »

Few hours to 2019 :)
"New Year" bugs , 2 times:
SL+batchmode:
Stored SL dats in [PROFILES]/MAME/SL
And  have new or update SL dats , if put new and update SL dats in any other folder and start batch mode with disable "No Rebuilder Run" :
cmpro found correct original path , examples: [PROFILES]/MAME/SL
but with 2 bugs :
1. Not change date of new SL dats
2. If have missing sets cmpro ingore that and report all it's green circles. ( very bad bug )

If added SL dats in correct stored pats ,examples : [PROFILES]/MAME/SL, all it's perfect after batch mode :
1. correct date
2. red circle for missing sets

Here is 20:04 and i'm back to other room, see u next year :)

Logged

Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 120
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3443
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 71.0.3578.98 Chrome 71.0.3578.98
    • View Profile
Re: may found bug
« Reply #21 on: 01 January 2019, 11:24 »

Yeah, I've spotted that one (not updating the stats incl. red/green dot) some days ago already....didn't look at it yet though...Happy New Year
Logged

Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 120
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3443
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 71.0.3578.98 Chrome 71.0.3578.98
    • View Profile
Logged

oddi

  • Member
  • *
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 65.0 Firefox 65.0
    • View Profile
Re: may found bug
« Reply #23 on: 19 January 2019, 17:37 »

Hi Roman, all it's fine with the last canary build :)
batch mode, date, put in differents folder - whole is perfect

But...explain me this problem or not :
look this commit https://github.com/mamedev/mame/commit/b7bea7a50f5372d3e5bf7ead5aa34a2cfd23b699
set is rad_rsg

have 2 sets with same roms

cmpro show :


when rebuild cmpro build only main set rad_rsg with rom without subfolder rad_rsgp with same rom

This normal or I am confusing something ?

Upload set here : https://www43.zippyshare.com/v/24cX9hZd/file.html
Thank you :)

« Last Edit: 19 January 2019, 17:38 by oddi »
Logged

Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 120
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3443
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 71.0.3578.98 Chrome 71.0.3578.98
    • View Profile
Re: may found bug
« Reply #24 on: 19 January 2019, 19:00 »

do you have a current datfile handy?

identical sets are not that uncommon...there is for example natodef and natodefa in MAME since ages....and they (both) should rebuild fine
Logged

oddi

  • Member
  • *
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 65.0 Firefox 65.0
    • View Profile
Re: may found bug
« Reply #25 on: 19 January 2019, 19:25 »

U right , now look natodef and natodefa - same story , two sets in dat with same checksums , one archive without subfolder

cmpro merged this sets

upload here dat from this commit hash a143090d103584a1aedcb2939f1db740d10ff935:

https://www70.zippyshare.com/v/OLvDl2Md/file.html

Maybe that is false alarm ,who know :)
May all right with natodef and rad_rsg , i dont know how cmpro read this sets :)



« Last Edit: 19 January 2019, 19:30 by oddi »
Logged

Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 120
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3443
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 71.0.3578.98 Chrome 71.0.3578.98
    • View Profile
Re: may found bug
« Reply #26 on: 19 January 2019, 20:25 »

well, these 2 rad_rsg sets are in a parent/clone relationship, so if you have split or full merged sets, you will end with 1 set only since their roms are fully shared....the "clone" will disappear...which is perfectly fine.

In profiler options you got an option to not create "fake clones"....this is enabled by default...if you disable it and rebuild the set again, you will end up with 2....(however the scanner won't complain if you only have the one set..)...it's not recommended to turn this option off....


so...nothing new...nothing wrong....
Logged

oddi

  • Member
  • *
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Operating System:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 65.0 Firefox 65.0
    • View Profile
Re: may found bug
« Reply #27 on: 19 January 2019, 21:12 »

Thank you Roman for your amazing job :)
atm - sleep calm :)
« Last Edit: 19 January 2019, 21:13 by oddi »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 22 queries.