EMULAB Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: I have a question on this.  (Read 2367 times)

Dullaron

  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Operating System:
  • Windows 7/Server 2008 R2 Windows 7/Server 2008 R2
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 17.0 Firefox 17.0
    • View Profile
I have a question on this.
« on: 29 December 2012, 04:19 »

Set: King Derby (bootleg set 2)
Name: kingdrbb2 ROM: sg1_b.e1
Issue: Possible wrong nodump definition found A valid checksum for it within its parent/clone relationship was found though.
Insert found checksum instead of using the 'nodump'?

What do I put? No?
Logged


Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 88
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2797
  • Operating System:
  • Mac OS X Mac OS X
  • Browser:
  • Safari 6.0 Safari 6.0
    • View Profile
Re: I have a question on this.
« Reply #1 on: 29 December 2012, 08:28 »

it does not harm if you select 'yes'.
Logged

Dullaron

  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Operating System:
  • Windows 7/Server 2008 R2 Windows 7/Server 2008 R2
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 17.0 Firefox 17.0
    • View Profile
Re: I have a question on this.
« Reply #2 on: 29 December 2012, 10:07 »

Oh OK. Making sure it doesn't do anything to the ROM. :)
Logged

Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 88
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2797
  • Operating System:
  • Mac OS X Mac OS X
  • Browser:
  • Safari 6.0 Safari 6.0
    • View Profile
Re: I have a question on this.
« Reply #3 on: 29 December 2012, 12:18 »

it only replaces the not existing checksum in the datfile with one from the parent/clones
Logged

Dullaron

  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Operating System:
  • Windows 7/Server 2008 R2 Windows 7/Server 2008 R2
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 17.0 Firefox 17.0
    • View Profile
Re: I have a question on this.
« Reply #4 on: 29 December 2012, 21:18 »

OK I found a real problem.

mess64 -listxml >mess64.xml

clrmamepro wasn't able to read it. Ton of 0 popping up saying it is not read able.

But get this. clrmamepro can read the mess64.exe just fine. No errors on this end.

/Edit.

No problem with the mame64.exe and mame64.xml loading.
« Last Edit: 29 December 2012, 21:20 by Dullaron »
Logged

Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 88
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2797
  • Operating System:
  • Mac OS X Mac OS X
  • Browser:
  • Safari 6.0 Safari 6.0
    • View Profile
Re: I have a question on this.
« Reply #5 on: 30 December 2012, 08:03 »

mess' xml is different from mame's elementwise. so of course you need other profiler parser settings than DATFILE when reading in the file.
Logged

Dullaron

  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Operating System:
  • Windows 7/Server 2008 R2 Windows 7/Server 2008 R2
  • Browser:
  • Firefox 17.0 Firefox 17.0
    • View Profile
Re: I have a question on this.
« Reply #6 on: 30 December 2012, 13:24 »

Using the one from the UME. I switch to this. It have MAME and MESS together. I didn't find any issues at all. =)
Logged

Roman

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 88
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2797
  • Operating System:
  • Mac OS X Mac OS X
  • Browser:
  • Safari 6.0 Safari 6.0
    • View Profile
Re: I have a question on this.
« Reply #7 on: 30 December 2012, 16:16 »

there are no issues with the others either if you tell the profiler how to read them in correctly. but anyway a direct exe import is always the easier choice
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.129 seconds with 22 queries.