EMULAB Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
 1 
 on: 24 April 2024, 08:37 
Started by dumbolines - Last post by nnobody
Hi dumbolines,
I'm also new member today. Hope we have the best time to enjoy this forum here! :) :)

 2 
 on: 22 April 2024, 06:11 
Started by BlackPredator72 - Last post by Svenbeer
ARMAX MAME DATs 0.264 https://www.mameguide.info/MAME_(20240327).7zweb
no idea if someone here needs it .....
Thank you!

 3 
 on: 17 April 2024, 07:11 
Started by Agard - Last post by rainsignal
in set information i use invert then i keep all for awbios hikaru naomi2 airlbios naomi f355dlx f355bios naomigd hot2bios segasp

i'm wanting to keep all roms bios & chd files from all those systems listed above am i doing it the right way?
it keeps removing rom tetgiano & it keeps renaming tetgiant chd to tetgiano

is this wrong ?

It's possible that the tool you're using might be encountering some issues with the specific ROM and CHD files for 'tetgiano.' Have you tried manually checking and organizing the files to see if there's any discrepancy?

 4 
 on: 07 April 2024, 11:57 
Started by oldieboy - Last post by Roman
Removing can be costy in 7z especially when using solid archives since the removal part alone would require the archive to get recompressed. So it may not even be the backup process but the removal of the original archive.

But again, moving some parts of an archive to backup would require a decompression and recompression in case of 7z, so I highly doubt that will be faster.
A different case would be if the full archive would be obsolete, then of course a simple filesystem based move would be quick.

The new scanner might be a bit more clever in that case (actually the removal of unneeded files is the next part on my to do list...so I will take it into account)

 5 
 on: 07 April 2024, 09:53 
Started by oldieboy - Last post by oldieboy
I just waited for some gigabytes to be removed from 7z archives and zipped to backup folder. That is when I started to wonder if zipping could be skipped.

Uncompressed backup folder would be nice option, thank you.


 6 
 on: 07 April 2024, 09:18 
Started by oldieboy - Last post by Roman
If a file within an archive is unneeded it gets moved to the backup folder and since 7z does not support a direct copy of compressed data, you always have a decompress + compress step, so it doesn't really matter if zip or 7z is used. Actually zip would even be faster since it would support direct copy of compressed data (but currently I don't know if this is used when backing up data...I somehow doubt it).
Generally for backup zip is used. You can't change it.

"waste, because files will often be re-compressed with 7-Zip again"
erm...why? If cmpro moves files to the backup they usually stay there since they are unneeded.

"Too much time"....well, usually (unless you scan a completely wrong path), you only have some unneeded files which get moved to backup...so the time argument is not really that important in my opinion....and as I said, no matter if you use 7z or zip, the files get decompressed and recompressed anyhow just for backup.

Maybe I change this for the new scanner....

 7 
 on: 07 April 2024, 07:18 
Started by oldieboy - Last post by oldieboy
Hello, I am using 7-Zip as a compressor, no problem here. But when clrmamepro is backing up files to backup folder, it always zips those files (7z -> zip).

How does one stop that behavior? Uncompressed files are OK when backing up, zipping just takes too much time (and is waste, because files will often be re-compressed with 7-Zip again).

That probably is a problem only when using external packer, internal zipper handles that kind of situation OK.

 8 
 on: 05 April 2024, 20:24 
Started by coccola - Last post by coccola
I've managed to find the problem thanks to your reply: there was a zip and a 7z with the same filename. I was using BatchMode, that's why I couldn't see the warning. Thank you!

 9 
 on: 05 April 2024, 19:29 
Started by coccola - Last post by Roman
Ensure you got all sets enabled (Scanner->SetInformation->Select All), all check options enabled and do a new scan. If you like, you can somehow send me the datfile....
Or you can try to hit Profiler's "Refresh List" button.

 10 
 on: 05 April 2024, 13:57 
Started by coccola - Last post by coccola
I have nothing missing on the Watara - Supervision dat (zero on Missing Sets, Missing ROMs, Missing CHDs and Missing Bytes) but I don't get a green check mark.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 17 queries.