EMULAB Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - hap

Pages: [1]
2
cool =)

3
Ah indeed, that's a better idea, didn't think of it.
Even if you take away nameclashes, it is a much cleaner way for a fully merged romset rather than throwing it all under 1 folder.

4
This is the message that pops up when Clrmame finds a rom inside a clone that has the same name as one in the parent but a different hash:

"Issue:   Can't merge set due to equal names for different ROM hashes
Press yes to remove parent/clone relationship or no to force split-merge mode."

Instead of that, how about this? "Press yes to rename this file to origname(__setname).xx or no to force split-merge mode.".

Since Clrmame is the most-used rom manager, currently MAME goes all the way around this issue and forces to have names of roms like that itself. IMO it'd be cleaner if this was done inside Clrmame instead, for people that want a completely merged romset.

5
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.00 released
« on: 01 September 2011, 22:41 »
Ah I see, odd that 7zip 'test archive' says it's error free. I unzipped/rezipped it and it's good now. Thanks for checking it out.

6
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.00 released
« on: 31 August 2011, 19:34 »
yay version++

There's a bugreport about Naomi bios over at mw.info forum.

Another: if the host OS of a file in a zip archive is Macintosh, clrmamepro won't detect the file, works ok if host OS is FAT/NTFS/Unix. It worked fine in the previous version.
Assuming such a zip archive is rare and you don't have any way to create one, see attachment. I suppose it's against the rules but this is for the good :p please moderate it afterwards.

7
clrmame Discussion / bug: "no to all" can mean "yes"
« on: 13 March 2011, 14:32 »
This is an odd bug where "No" (just hold the N key) isn't the same as "No to all" when clrmamepro asks if it can add checksums to NO_DUMP roms when building a new database. As far as I know, it only affects saiyugou (clone of chinagat).

Pages: [1]

Page created in 0.107 seconds with 21 queries.

anything