EMULAB Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - haynor666

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
41
clrmame Discussion / Re: nightly build....
« on: 08 July 2015, 17:54 »
According to some mamedevs arcade ,mess subtargets won't live long. Soon the will be mame or custom build with predefined drivers.

42
clrmame Discussion / Re: chds baddumps presentation
« on: 19 July 2014, 18:20 »
Ok, thanks for explanation :)

43
clrmame Discussion / chds baddumps presentation
« on: 19 July 2014, 09:32 »
Today I did some check in mame chds. I need to know how many and which one are still v4 and after full scanner tests I've received list where some chds are marked in blue, some are marked black.

Is there any difference between those two groups ?

44
I've replace 7z_64.dll in clrmamepro folder with other versions that came with 7z msi installer.

I just tested clrmamepro behaviour with different versions of 7z libray (outdated 9.20, stable 9.22b and 9.32a)  :)

45
Baines, I've check your file and it's ok inclrmamepro x64 with any 7z library (7.20, 7.22b, 7.32a)

46
I've check both 32 and 64 versions of 7z_.dll in clrmame zip package -both reports 7.20.

I've check also 7.32a installers both with 7z.dll version 7.32

Question: Roman is it safe to use 7.32a instead 7.22 ?

47
So that's fine because I'm using 7.22 beta. My 7z 7.22b is located together with it's library in program files.

So maybe Baines mixed library with wrong exe.

48
in clrmamepro dir is 7z_64.dll with size 1422336 in 7zip dir is 7z.dll 7.22beta with size 1478656

Might cause those problems ?

49
Totally forgot one thing. In many cases 7z.exe must together with it's library 7z.dll. Otherwise it might not recognize some archives, file formats like iso (tested).

It's better to make clean install of 7zip and the configure path to it's folder.

BTW. latest alpha versions of 7zip uses LZMA2 as default compression method.

EDIT. Tested rebuild with 2 identical directories - both have full 153 set and. I've fake (nothing to rebuild since both directories are exactly the same) rebuild and with options additionally test SH1/MD5 of existing destination  test archive (decompress to memory) - pass 100% correctly.

50
I didn't use this option because I assume building from scratch does need this. I'll check at home this problem.

BTW. You are using default 7z settings or modified? I changed options to LZMA2, multithreating and word, dictionary set to 256.

51
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 11 April 2014, 06:53 »
For better space savings 7z is the best but you get slower rom loading in mame for example c1k or neogeo  bigger roms. Also rebuild,fix, scan processes are longer. I have 3 TB disk so I have plenty of free space but this set is also used in my cab where I have only 250 gb disk so I prefer to keep set in 7z.

Please note that clrmamepro does not build solid archives. After t7z archives even smaller.

From my experience build clean set using zip then using t7z for "special" purpurose is faster than rebuild 7z and then again t7z.

52
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 10 April 2014, 17:40 »
t7z is ok but only for recompressing for "specific" task. Using it as main compress does not make sense. Better compress with zip then recompress with t7z.

53
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 10 April 2014, 09:42 »
I've made rebuild two times using MAME 153 as a base dat. Both pass fine with word 256 and dictionary 256m using LZMA2. One pass took about 6,5 h on i5 4670k

Also fast scans (just under 5 mins) and full scans with chd, 7zip integrity, CRC32, MD5 (about 45 mins) are fine.

54
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 05 April 2014, 12:52 »
Since so much has been changed in recent versions time to test rebuild, scanner etc. :)

55
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 04 April 2014, 21:12 »
Most recent update fixes those lzma warnings. Thanks Roman :)

56
clrmame Discussion / Re: [BUG] RAR volume open lockup
« on: 23 December 2013, 12:24 »
So, after all there is was bug in rar deleting. Thanks for the fix Roman :)

Now there is only left 7z bug.

57
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 19 December 2013, 23:10 »
I have 6 Gb :)

58
clrmame Discussion / Re: [BUG] RAR volume open lockup
« on: 19 December 2013, 18:53 »
I've also noticed that with latest winrar clrmamepro does not wan't to remove files inside rar files but packing works good.

59
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 19 December 2013, 18:49 »
Problem is not fixed in recent version.

60
clrmame Discussion / Re: Strange 7z LZMA2 warnings
« on: 02 August 2013, 19:51 »
Thanks for fix this problem  :)

I understand this is not implemented in most recent version of clrmame, right?

BTW. I hope some day solid compression will be fully supported in clrmame. Right repacking torrent7z files are big pain.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Page created in 0.183 seconds with 19 queries.