1
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.048d released
« on: 17 February 2024, 10:26 »
Latest 7-Zip beta does have included zstandard compression method.
- 12 September 2024, 05:12
- Welcome, Guest
News:
The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.048d released
« on: 23 January 2024, 18:03 »
I was curious about new compressor so after tests I added example file because You ask it 
Personally I'm more interested in chds delta since it saves a lot more space. Besides we already have support for rar and 7z in MAME so zstandard won't change to much I think.
Personally I'm more interested in chds delta since it saves a lot more space. Besides we already have support for rar and 7z in MAME so zstandard won't change to much I think.
3
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.048d released
« on: 12 January 2024, 20:38 »
I did some tests with 7zip that has zstandard built. zstandard appears to be a sometimes a little bigger sometimes a little smaller with comparison to 7z ZLMA2. RAR it's even again a little bigger than zstandard or 7zip but it's faster.
https://mega.nz/file/801HzBSD#dWS5qbyqgqiY2mzgEeaV_wgNHztjsgcMEyv2PCYxEqI
https://mega.nz/file/801HzBSD#dWS5qbyqgqiY2mzgEeaV_wgNHztjsgcMEyv2PCYxEqI
4
clrmame Discussion / Re: delta chds, cmpro test version
« on: 12 January 2024, 19:35 »
I did some tests and appears to be working correctly but of course not all chds are converted.
7
clrmame Discussion / Re: delta chds, cmpro test version
« on: 20 December 2023, 21:48 »
That's lot of disk space 
8
clrmame Discussion / Re: delta chds, cmpro test version
« on: 20 December 2023, 21:23 »
Yeah, I've seen this issue. For now feature in test but I was curious how much it could save disk space and time for full test chds. Guess we have to wait a bit before full switch to deltas
9
clrmame Discussion / Re: delta chds, cmpro test version
« on: 20 December 2023, 19:34 »
Ok, I've converted couple of chds into delta but right now scanner (full with chd integrity check) shows those deltas as entegrity check failed 
10
clrmame Discussion / Re: delta chds, cmpro test version
« on: 20 December 2023, 18:55 »
I didn't have any, so far
Window was behind scanner window
Window was behind scanner window
11
clrmame Discussion / Re: delta chds, cmpro test version
« on: 20 December 2023, 17:53 »
I think I miss something here. I don't see any warnings about delta after full scan even if I choose option about showing delta. Do I have to full scan with crc checking of chds ?
12
clrmame Discussion / Re: Rebuilder 0.06 released
« on: 07 May 2023, 18:26 »
More realistic versus my previous tests 
Anyway it's improvement comparing to version 005.
Anyway it's improvement comparing to version 005.
13
clrmame Discussion / Re: Rebuilder 0.06 released
« on: 07 May 2023, 17:32 »
This time for version 254 and archives in zips so test differs from previous but I think most people will rebuild from zip files so it's more realistic scenario.
14
clrmame Discussion / Re: rebuilder 0.05 released
« on: 17 April 2023, 11:16 »
Worth to mention that some zip archives have different crcs (for example 1941.zip) but size and files inside are exactly the same. Most of zips are exactly the same. I assume that clrmamepro adds some files into zips with different order.
15
clrmame Discussion / Re: rebuilder 0.05 released
« on: 17 April 2023, 10:39 »
Rebuilded from the same source. Started at 7:15 ended about 12:35 so more than 5 hours was needed for entire process
16
clrmame Discussion / Re: rebuilder 0.05 released
« on: 16 April 2023, 18:18 »
Whole process started exactly 16:00:00. 7:58 took scan rebuild process was ended exactly at 20:16:10.
Now let's see how it will take with use of clrmame.
Now let's see how it will take with use of clrmame.
17
clrmame Discussion / Re: rebuilder 0.05 released
« on: 16 April 2023, 16:48 »
It's intentional - I'm not sure if source zip file is checked against any errors so I need everything rezipped. Anyway 46 % done and about 2 hours and 40 mins passed.
18
clrmame Discussion / Re: rebuilder 0.05 released
« on: 16 April 2023, 16:15 »
Rebuilder reported 170398 unique roms. 23% and about 2 hours pass. I'm using rezip method but this probably does not matter since all roms are extracted from zip archives.
19
clrmame Discussion / Re: rebuilder 0.05 released
« on: 16 April 2023, 14:43 »
CHDs are removed for now
Target directory is on clean/formatted partition.
Target directory is on clean/formatted partition.
20
clrmame Discussion / Re: rebuilder 0.05 released
« on: 16 April 2023, 14:35 »
I disabled SHA1 for tests. rebuilder is put on M.2 disk as well togehter with mame.XML file. About 8 mins took scan of whole roms folder. About 26 mins. took 10% of rebuilding.