Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

1

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: Yesterday at 20:40 »

This sounds a bit like you have compressed all ngp software files into a ngp.7z.
You need a folderstructure like: your_drive:\your_rompath\ngp\ and in that ngp folder you've got the single ngp software list machine, so e.g.
bstars.7z, kof_mlon.7z, etc...(or zip or decompressed).

so for example:
f:\mame\roms\softwarelist (as your one and only rompath which is the
root of the single software list subfolders)
f:\mame\roms\softwarelist\a2600  with
f:\mame\roms\softwarelist\a2600\2pakblac.zip,
f:\mame\roms\softwarelist\a2600\2pakblaca.zip and so on
f:\mame\roms\softwarelist\c64_cart with
f:\mame\roms\softwarelist\c64_cart\4thsarc.zip and so on...

2

clrmame Discussion / Re: CLRMamePro changing *.dat file attributes to hidden?

« on: 21 March 2025, 06:30 »

Ah....the datfile in the zip file seems to have some uncommon file attributes set (most likely it was built on an unix machine) which seem to generate a +h on Windows systems (at least when zipclass library extracts it, the internal Windows unzip seems to use some standard attributes then).

So...I blame the file in the zip

3

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 21 March 2025, 06:30 »

With "I can't even reconnect in Explorer" you mean Windows, not clrmame, right?

Maybe you can also try to use the UNC path of the share directly instead of a mapped drive (e.g. \\fileserver2\roms) ... but before that it should work in the explorer though (e.g. when it needs authorization...)

4

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 20 March 2025, 18:13 »

damn....I thought that long path prefix would be the solution.....thanks for testing

5

clrmame Discussion / Re: CLRMamePro changing *.dat file attributes to hidden?

« on: 20 March 2025, 12:56 »

clrmamepro doesn't alter filter attributes to hidden anywhere.
There might be cases during a scan where rom/sample files/archives or files inside such archives get their file attributes altered. But only +a, -r.
Datfiles or settings files' file attributes aren't touched at all.

6

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 17 March 2025, 07:56 »

ok, here is a custom version (just the exe file) where long path name support is disabled:

https://mamedev.emulab.it/clrmamepro/binaries/shortPathOnly_clrmameUI.zip

would be interesting to know if that is the reason for failing on your SMB client setup

7

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 16 March 2025, 19:06 »

Actually I found some information in the internet that the long path name support could be the reason why it fails on SMB client drives.
clrmame automatically adds \\?\ prefixes to paths so that 32k full path length is supported. Asking chatGPT about possible problems comes back with:

"Yes, there are known issues when using std::filesystem with SMB (Server Message Block) client drives, especially when working with long paths and the \\?\ prefix for long path support in Windows.
Here are some key points that could help clarify the situation:
The \\?\ Prefix: The \\?\ prefix is used to enable long path support on Windows, and it is required when working with file paths longer than 260 characters (which was previously the maximum path length in Windows). This prefix is often used for paths that exceed the traditional MAX_PATH limit, and it bypasses some of the legacy file system API restrictions.
SMB and \\?\: The \\?\ prefix is not always well-supported with network shares, especially when using SMB. Some APIs that work with local paths may not work seamlessly with network paths, particularly when the path includes the \\?\ prefix. SMB file systems may have limitations that prevent proper handling of long paths or the special \\?\ format."


So what I can do is that I compile you a version where no prefix is added....and if that's the reason I could add an automated test for it....so I guess I come back to you in the next days.

8

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 16 March 2025, 15:39 »

"can't parse Z:\MAME\PC\mame.exe"

hmm..interesting....because this means it can't even access a mame binary on your shared drive or run an export for it.
This time no directory_iterator is involved....
So...I'd say.....access rights....I know this doesn't help at the moment. Are you familar with c++? Or got Visual Studio available...then running a small program which simply does some std::filesystem calls on your given path may give some insight on this....

9

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 16 March 2025, 11:11 »

Yeah the spam bot is annoying...
Well...what I see from the rebuilder log is that you get the same problem with the rebuilder on the files without using the "." but a full path:
Analyzing rebuilder source Y:\MAME\ROMs failed due to recursive_directory_iterator::recursive_directory_iterator: Invalid Signature.: "Y:\MAME\ROMs"
.....and it shows that also recursive_directory_iterator and not only directory_iterator calls have the problem. So it's a general accessing problem, not a "." specific one.

I've attached a 2 textfiles what chatGPT returned on this topic......so it sounds more or less like access rights problems....

You can try to use the old clrmamepro to see if this gives some results on the path, however it doesn't use plain stl::filesystem calls but win32 api calls which (see chatgpt2.txt) might have different additional features regarding network drives). You can also try to run clrmame with admin rights, or -if you're familiar with c++, you can write a very small program which simply uses a std::filesystem::directory_iterator call on your mapped path.....
Generally mapped network drives don't cause problems...but I can't rebuild your specific setup here....maybe some other forum visitor has an idea.

10

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 15 March 2025, 18:53 »

When scanning, clrmame changes to the romfolder and if this succeeds, it uses a directory iterator on the "." (current path).
Maybe you (or clrmame) don't have access rights?
Guess that can be tested when you simply use the rebuilder from that folder to elsewhere. The rebuilder accesses file files via full names since it does a (recursive) directory iterator on the full input path name. That would give an idea if access rights or full path names might be an issue....

11

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 14 March 2025, 12:55 »

That would be great. Actually, when fixing is still at 0% it's still in the "fix missing rom" phase so when files are added to a rompath from either backup, addpaths or from a different set....
The fix order is like:

- per machine
  - fix missing roms, fix missing disks
  - fix wrong named roms/samples/disks
- fix wrong named machines
- fix unneeded

so if fixing was at 0% for you I'd assume it was still in the fix missing part...(e.g. that also happens when a sl like the amiga 1000/3000 is renamed, the folders themselves are unneeded but the files are used for fixing/adding them at the correct place.

12

clrmame Discussion / Re: Problem Scanning an SMB Volume

« on: 14 March 2025, 08:09 »

Seems that a std::filesystem::directory_iterator (c++ stl function to run access all files within a folder) throws an exception for "." (the current folder) for whatever reason. I will have a look why it creates that error (since it works on a 'standard' Windows drive :-)). I will check if using "." can be changed or check why it could fail with your setup.

13

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 13 March 2025, 08:35 »

Hmm...ran some tests with the amiga 274-275 changes but currently I wasn't able to reproduce the problem (or even hit a crash once).

I will double check the backup fixes which came in from .2 to .3 if they can have a sideeffect. The problem back then was that when backuping it created endless subfolders, e.g. if a software list A was unneeded and contained A1 to A100 archives, it created a backup folder A\A1 then A\A1\A2 then A\A1\A2\A3 and so on.....instead of having the files simply stored in A....the fix is like 2 lines of code....and should end in a crash....but again...I will do further checks.

If you are able (or even have time) to reproduce the problem with a small setup, let me know....

14

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 12 March 2025, 19:36 »

If I remember correctly there were some amiga sl lists which were renamed/merged to a new list in last MAME release....so the original folders became unneeded and should be moved to the backup folder....before they should form the new folder though....I will have a look if I see something obvious when replaying that scenario.
There is a change in .3 which affects building the backups (which was wrong before ;-)) ...maybe that hit something weird....

Thanks for the feedback.

15

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 12 March 2025, 16:28 »

Hmm..sounds indeed like a crash. However there weren't that many changes from .2 to 3(1) which fall into that time window of starting fixing...

Could be a corrupt archive or something. Do a scan (without fix option enabled) and check the output which machines require fixing. So you may get an idea which files are affected. Maybe only a few are listed so testing would be not so time intensive...

When fixing is enabled, you can also try to enable log level "trace"...but if it simply shuts down it will be hard to see the log...so maybe you can use Windows' Snipping Tool to record a short movie ;-) So you might get an idea where it crashes.

By the way: there is no difference in roms or software lists internally.

Would be really interesting to find out which file is causing the problem. So would be great if you can somehow minimize the problem and contact me / send me the file in question.

16

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 03 March 2025, 18:03 »

Looks like I broke the showing of empty and complete items in clrmameUI 0.3 ...get a fixed one here: https://mamedev.emulab.it/clrmamepro/binaries/clrmame_v031.zip

17

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 28 February 2025, 08:51 »

Again: For software lists, you don't need 700+ profiles/xml files.

You can simply run a mame -listsoftware based scan. Specify just one folder as rompath. This folder is the parent of the sl folders (a2600,....)

18

clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 27 February 2025, 07:19 »

Hmm..don't know if I understand your questions correctly...

A batcher is planned for the (far away) future but surely you can write and run a shell script for the commandline version which runs over multiple xml files.
Unique xml files for softwarelist? Either you use a -listsoftware MAME export for all sl data in one file or you simply use the single XML files in MAME's hash folder.
chdlist? What should that be? A standalone datfile for chd files? For what? But most likely such things are floating around in the internet.

19

clrmame Discussion / clrmame 0.3 released

« on: 26 February 2025, 19:26 »

https://mamedev.emulab.it/clrmamepro/binaries/clrmame_v031.zip
https://mamedev.emulab.it/clrmamepro/binaries/readme.html

UI:

added: optionally hide/show roms/disks/samples output via context menu
fixed: remove datasource XML file when hash folder changed (should only happen when XML file was internally created from an exe export)

Core:

added: "available:" filter which limits the machine selection to files you have. You might notice a count difference in total vs filtered even when you got all files. This is based on the fact that a) empty sets are excluded and b) there are clones which are totally included in their parent, so -in split mode- you don't have a standalone file/folder for it. So don't worry about the count.
misc: "file:" filter, in case you work with softwarelist collections, you'd need to prefix single entries with sl-name#pacman (e.g. a2600#pacman) to specify which set you're refering to. Not needed for single sl files or standard dats though.
misc: some earlier cancel returns in fix wrong named disk/sample/rom/machine
misc: dupe output now shows all found paths belonging to a machine
misc: updated spdlog to 1.15.1
misc: limited AUTO thread switch to 25 threads as max (or less depending on your hardware). You can still manually select more or less if you like
fixed: dupes can be listed multiple times
fixed: backups for unneeded folders can create wrong and very long folders due to wrong encapsuling
fixed: backup can miss empty unneeded folders at first scan
fixed: fill-in file from addpath/backup path was removed (when requested) even when fill-in copy failed and you might had a 0 byte new archive
fixed: log pattern in commandline mode

20

clrmame Discussion / Re: v02 clrmame - how i can hide the "missing disk" related to CHD from result ?

« on: 25 February 2025, 18:53 »

well...of course you could create an xpath filter which does not include "NOT WORKING" machines which contain disk files....if there is a good indicator for it...which I somehow doubt.....