EMULAB Forum

clrmamepro [English] => clrmame Discussion => Topic started by: Roo on 27 July 2010, 17:54

Title: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roo on 27 July 2010, 17:54

I think this might be a bug, please feel free to correct me if I am missing something.

The problem is that the miss list shows missing sets when sample sets have no corresponding rom set.

Quote

You are missing 1 of 8734 known MAME v0.138 sets (+ BIOS sets)

alphamc07

Steps to reproduce:
Create dat file from mame.exe (mame0138b.exe downloaded from http://mamedev.org)
"OK to all" when prompted "Missing Alternative Samplefolder will be added as sample-only set."
"No to all" when prompted "Press yes to remove parent/clone relationship or no to force split-merge mode."
"No to all" when prompted "Insert found checksum instead of using the 'nodump'?"
Add rom path for roms
Add rom path for chds
Add sample path for samples
Scan with sets, roms, samples and chds selected, all "check" categories selected, no "fix" categories selected
Results window is empty
Statistics window shows:

Quote

Missing
·Sets                 0/8734
·Roms                 0/127120
·CHDs                 0/447
·Samples              0/2542
·Bytes                0/80gb

Click on "Miss List..." to generate miss list, which shows 1 missing set, as shown above.

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roman on 27 July 2010, 18:35

Miss and have lists are pretty inaccurate since they only do a quick set lookup...nothing else...
Stats are also not very helpful.
Only trust what the scan tree window shows.

...however I will check your reported thing when I'm back from holiday...most likely in a week

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roo on 27 July 2010, 20:31

Great, thanks Roman!  And thanks for all your hard work, I've used clrmamepro for years, excellent software!!!

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roman on 28 July 2010, 07:56

you're welcome....and don't use the damn old miss/have lists ;)

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roo on 29 July 2010, 04:32

Ah, but I store a miss list in with each of my rom directories.  I love the miss list function and use it all the time!  Please fix it when you get a chance :)

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roman on 29 July 2010, 07:28

user scanner's popupmenu->Export SetList instead...and define your own format in setformat.xml (or setformat1.xml to avoid overwriting).

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roo on 31 July 2010, 05:00

That's a nice alternative that I wasn't aware of, thanks for pointing it out! 

And it would be even cooler if it were to save a file even if there were no reported problems   ;D

Thanks again for taking the time to help out Roman, your work is very much appreciated!

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roman on 03 August 2010, 20:19

well...fixed your have/miss list issue with sample-only sets for next release...

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roo on 04 August 2010, 05:07

Awesome!  Thanks Roman!!!   ;D

Title: Re: Possible bug in clrmamepro v3.134b?
Post by: Roman on 04 August 2010, 20:09

well....easy fix....miss/have lists didn't check for sample-only sets...