1
clrmame Discussion / Re: delta chds, cmpro test version
« on: 26 October 2023, 18:26 »
I try all - with delta, miss delta, bad delta ...and more delta warnings...and nothing.
Cmpro completed scan without warnings
All is fine, my mistake
- 05 May 2024, 05:11
- Welcome, Guest
News:
The new forum is online, hope you enjoy it!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I try all - with delta, miss delta, bad delta ...and more delta warnings...and nothing.
Cmpro completed scan without warnings
All is fine, my mistake
2
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.046 released
« on: 15 August 2022, 17:02 »
From years ago i strong follow your advices for best cmpro settings, and now what ?!?, u killed uncle oddi.
3
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.046 released
« on: 15 August 2022, 16:28 »
Ok Roman , sorry , dont understand you
total broken my sets....
Cmpro play ping pong with copy chds ( from chds folder to roms and back from roms to chds folder )
Now investigate where is problem - me, cmpro or mame code
have few chds with same SHA1 with different names, think cmpro dont like this chds...maybe, i'm not sure.
P.s. upload here MAME git mame0246-190-geece0c125ca.7z
https://www54.zippyshare.com/v/u4Cuyx4Z/file.html
first affected set is aa3020, have 3 chds with same int. SHA1 in 3 different sets,
next is area51 and etc etc.
total broken my sets....
Cmpro play ping pong with copy chds ( from chds folder to roms and back from roms to chds folder )
Now investigate where is problem - me, cmpro or mame code
have few chds with same SHA1 with different names, think cmpro dont like this chds...maybe, i'm not sure.
P.s. upload here MAME git mame0246-190-geece0c125ca.7z
https://www54.zippyshare.com/v/u4Cuyx4Z/file.html
first affected set is aa3020, have 3 chds with same int. SHA1 in 3 different sets,
next is area51 and etc etc.
4
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.046 released
« on: 15 August 2022, 16:01 »
Hmm, Roman , explain me please how fix my paths in 4.046
look my mame roms/chds folders and settings :
Cmpro 4.046 wanna "move" all chds from "G:\MAME\Mame_CHDs\" to "G:\MAME\Mame_ROMs" root folder !!!.
And why "move", because cmpro say " move chds..blabla" , but only copy chds to root folder without remove from old space ( tiny bug maybe).
Thank you
P.S. My mistake , move only 2 chds from ACORN sets ,
but remove all chds with same hashesh and differents names.
funny
now uncle oddi try broken him full MAME sets for testing.
look my mame roms/chds folders and settings :
Cmpro 4.046 wanna "move" all chds from "G:\MAME\Mame_CHDs\" to "G:\MAME\Mame_ROMs" root folder !!!.
And why "move", because cmpro say " move chds..blabla" , but only copy chds to root folder without remove from old space ( tiny bug maybe).
Thank you
P.S. My mistake , move only 2 chds from ACORN sets ,
but remove all chds with same hashesh and differents names.
funny
now uncle oddi try broken him full MAME sets for testing.
5
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.046 released
« on: 15 August 2022, 12:08 »
Roman, with 4.046 other issue:
cmpro wanna move mame chds to roms folder.
if revert to 4.0.45 - whole is fine , missing both problems: - hash colision mode and above example.
I temporary reverted to old version.
Thank you
cmpro wanna move mame chds to roms folder.
if revert to 4.0.45 - whole is fine , missing both problems: - hash colision mode and above example.
I temporary reverted to old version.
Thank you
6
clrmame Discussion / Re: clrmamepro 4.046 released
« on: 15 August 2022, 04:17 »
Hello Roman, this build separate Mame CHDs ( full merge mode) in subfolders.
Please look this.
example with area51:
before
after
Thank you:)
Please look this.
example with area51:
before
after
Thank you:)
8
clrmame Discussion / Re: Cmpro "misplaced a romset" !?
« on: 06 June 2022, 08:47 »
Hello Roman, me too tested with the last mame git, result:
with 4.044c --> it's ok
with 4.044d --> above issue
Thank you
with 4.044c --> it's ok
with 4.044d --> above issue
Thank you
9
clrmame Discussion / Cmpro "misplaced a romset" !?
« on: 04 June 2022, 09:45 »
Roman, what is that "misplaced a romset", i have this sets, use cmpro 4.044d
10
clrmame Discussion / again problem with new tag
« on: 22 February 2022, 09:26 »
Hi Roman, please look attached xml, again have problem with new tag "![CDATA[..." etc.
Line 52503, if remove tag - cmpro also stop beind angry
Thanks in advance.
Remove ext ".zip"
Line 52503, if remove tag - cmpro also stop beind angry
Thanks in advance.
Remove ext ".zip"
11
clrmame Discussion / Re: Cmpro dont like chd !
« on: 01 August 2021, 11:11 »
Many tnx Roman, testing.... and again good job
12
clrmame Discussion / Cmpro dont like chd !
« on: 26 July 2021, 15:58 »
Hi Roman , please look why cmpro dont like chd from ibm5170_cdrom.xml.
here upload chd: bonuspak.chd
https://www58.zippyshare.com/v/b8fuqkEu/file.html
and attach dat file.
Thank you:)
P.S.
Look fragment from xml:
Have clone with same name wit status "nodump". Maybe that is problem ?
here upload chd: bonuspak.chd
https://www58.zippyshare.com/v/b8fuqkEu/file.html
and attach dat file.
Thank you:)
P.S.
Look fragment from xml:
Code: [Select]
<software name="os2warp3">
<description>OS/2 Warp</description>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher>IBM</publisher>
<!-- Internal revision 8.162 (94/09/19), XR03000 -->
<info name="version" value="3.00"/>
<part name="cdrom1" interface="cdrom">
<!-- Origin: archive.org -->
<feature name="part_id" value="OS/2 Warp"/>
<feature name="part_number" value="83G8450"/>
<diskarea name="cdrom">
<disk name="os2cdrom" sha1="e316dd95d88d6e63da84b3751dbf9521f87a6bc8"/>
</diskarea>
</part>
<part name="cdrom2" interface="cdrom">
<!-- Origin: archive.org -->
<feature name="part_id" value="BonusPak for OS/2 version 3"/>
<feature name="part_number" value="19H6166"/>
<diskarea name="cdrom">
<disk name="bonuspak" sha1="8c874361fd00458a9bdf730fe6b57cc56b2d840e"/>
</diskarea>
</part>
</software>
<software name="os2warp3b" cloneof="os2warp3">
<description>OS/2 Warp with Win-OS/2</description>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher>IBM</publisher>
<!-- Internal revision 8.200 (94/11/09), XR03001 -->
<part name="cdrom1" interface="cdrom">
<feature name="part_id" value="OS/2 Warp with Win-OS/2"/>
<diskarea name="cdrom">
<disk name="os2_cd_rom" sha1="8337e382b724ed398e98e881df91ef5d17fab237"/>
</diskarea>
</part>
<part name="cdrom2" interface="cdrom">
<!-- Missing -->
<feature name="part_id" value="BonusPak for OS/2 version 3"/>
<diskarea name="cdrom">
<disk name="bonuspak" status="nodump"/>
</diskarea>
</part>Have clone with same name wit status "nodump". Maybe that is problem ?
13
clrmame Discussion / Re: Folders "Magnavox Odyssey 2/Philips Videopac" vs. "Philips Videopac/Odyssey 2"?
« on: 03 April 2021, 11:47 »
@mjmattson3170
Take from mame source:
Author: hap <[email protected]>
Author date: 7 months ago (23.8.2020 г. 17:33:40)
Commit date: 7 months ago (23.8.2020 г. 17:33:53)
Commit hash: 8cde9585e685bd08125d083102d51b3e84ec1b51
Child: 113de382
Parent: 5ed80089
odyssey2: rename hash files to videopac and videopacp
Think u must reorganization your SL
Good luck
Take from mame source:
Author: hap <[email protected]>
Author date: 7 months ago (23.8.2020 г. 17:33:40)
Commit date: 7 months ago (23.8.2020 г. 17:33:53)
Commit hash: 8cde9585e685bd08125d083102d51b3e84ec1b51
Child: 113de382
Parent: 5ed80089
odyssey2: rename hash files to videopac and videopacp
Think u must reorganization your SL
Good luck
14
clrmame Discussion / Re: ..SL CHDs and right place problem
« on: 04 January 2021, 17:33 »
Thank you so much and sorry for false alarm
15
clrmame Discussion / ..SL CHDs and right place problem
« on: 04 January 2021, 12:33 »
Hello Roman, Happy New Year
New year = new luck = new cmpro problems
Found problem with new PSX SL CHDS
cmpro dont wanna move chds to right place
scan progress:
scan finish:
If manual move "dragon ball z - ultimate battle 22 (usa).chd" to new folder with right name "dbzub22" - cmpro report all is fine.
Please check where is problem, Thank you
attach psx xml
and upload folder with 2 chds here for test: https://www13.zippyshare.com/v/w9l9Srcs/file.html
New year = new luck = new cmpro problems
Found problem with new PSX SL CHDS
cmpro dont wanna move chds to right place
scan progress:
scan finish:
If manual move "dragon ball z - ultimate battle 22 (usa).chd" to new folder with right name "dbzub22" - cmpro report all is fine.
Please check where is problem, Thank you
attach psx xml
and upload folder with 2 chds here for test: https://www13.zippyshare.com/v/w9l9Srcs/file.html
16
clrmame Discussion / Re: cmpro not removed unneeded chds
« on: 05 March 2020, 14:28 »
OK boss, maybe is false alarm, sorry.
Now retest with clean caches - whole is fine.
Thread closed. Thank you
Now retest with clean caches - whole is fine.
Thread closed. Thank you
17
clrmame Discussion / Re: cmpro not removed unneeded chds
« on: 05 March 2020, 08:00 »
Sorry, here not problem with open link.
OK, reupload to my mega:
https://mega.nz/#!Bxl0mCrC!hwhWcDmS7hpXGvGaxpaQD-I0j0Szr0qmk_BO3VbexC4
OK, reupload to my mega:
https://mega.nz/#!Bxl0mCrC!hwhWcDmS7hpXGvGaxpaQD-I0j0Szr0qmk_BO3VbexC4
18
clrmame Discussion / cmpro not removed unneeded chds
« on: 05 March 2020, 07:18 »
Hello Roman, report "old" bug about unneeded chds.
cmpro not move unneed chds , only copy same chds in cmpro backup folder.
Give example with the last fmtowns cd sets
Here upload "cmpro.rar"
https://www29.zippyshare.com/v/O2drmOv9/file.html
inside have "old" and "new" chd plus fmtowns xml.
Please check that. Thank you very much:)
P.S.
My first report:
long time ago
https://www.emulab.it/forum/index.php?topic=4078.msg16108#msg16108
cmpro not move unneed chds , only copy same chds in cmpro backup folder.
Give example with the last fmtowns cd sets
Here upload "cmpro.rar"
https://www29.zippyshare.com/v/O2drmOv9/file.html
inside have "old" and "new" chd plus fmtowns xml.
Please check that. Thank you very much:)
P.S.
My first report:
long time ago
https://www.emulab.it/forum/index.php?topic=4078.msg16108#msg16108
19
clrmame Discussion / Re: Skipped files while rebuilding and zip compression
« on: 01 June 2019, 17:14 »
@emulajavi:
If u used PD mame sets u must used PD dats.
Because torrent owner used different method for generate dats. If u wanna have 100% full sets used this dats.
Whats different between methods, dats and etc, i dont know .
For more question open thread in PD forum, dont touch Roman
If u used PD mame sets u must used PD dats.
Because torrent owner used different method for generate dats. If u wanna have 100% full sets used this dats.
Whats different between methods, dats and etc, i dont know .
For more question open thread in PD forum, dont touch Roman
20
clrmame Discussion / Re: Moving DatFile failed on folders created directly in datfile directory
« on: 01 February 2019, 17:31 »
Tested with the last nightly build, no problem with "Move Profile(s)".
Test differents scenarious about "moving" profiles, whole it's fine.
P.S. : What version u have - portable, installer, x86,x64 ?
Test differents scenarious about "moving" profiles, whole it's fine.
P.S. : What version u have - portable, installer, x86,x64 ?